The United States oligarchy

Let's review some recent history.

George HW Bush served for 8 years as Vice-President and then was elected President over Michael Dukakis in 1988.

Having spent years orchestrating events that came to be known as the "Iran-contra" scandal, US forces were sent into the Middle East to lead a UN operation to prevent Saddam Hussein from taking over Kuwait. His Republican Army was quickly pushed back into Baghdad, but President Bush chose not to overthrow Saddam at the time. Many in the media suggest that Bush preferred to maintain a status quo instead of committing US troops to a lengthy occupation effort.

In the 1992 reelection campaign, Bush was defeated because of the candidacy of Ross Perot, and the "read my lips, no new taxes" debacle. George HW Bush was out of the US government for the first time in decades, having been in the CIA for years before running with Ronald Reagan in 1980.

Enter Bill Clinton, exit large numbers of United States military personnel. The 1990's were marked by scandals, criminal activity, questionable campaign financing from Chinese sources, extreme tax hikes, repeated attacks agains the US by muslim killers, North Korean nuclear acquisition, WACO, Vince Foster, travelgate Whitewater, Ken Starr, etc...

The Democrat party has won very few elections of any notoreity since 1992, likely in large part to the negative impact and influence of the Clinton regime.

The 2000 election was litigated and ultimately George Bush prevailed. Having secured reelection [almost] officially as of today, the next step in the New World Order agenda is to select the correct UN Secretary general to replace the scandal stricken Kofi Annan.

In the time since the 9/11 attacks against America, President Bush has exhibited some strange behavior for somebody who campaigned on the promise of securing US sovereignty.

• He has committed US troops to serve in UN operations
• He has repeatedly attempted to get more UN involvement in the Iraqi reconstruction efforts
• After initially trying to establish a coalition to aid in the tsunami relief effort which was independent of the UN, President Bush ultimately capitulated and turned over even more US taxpayer funds to UN officials, despite their complete failure to run the "Oil-for-Food" program in Iraq

Is there any possibility that the Iraq invasion had anything to do with Saddam's recent decision to cease selling his oil for US dollars, in favor of the Euro? Is Iran considering the same policy, and is that why there were included in the "axis of evil"?

The powers that run the US gov't must have known that Clinton could never ascend to the head position in the UN with a Democrat President because the Republicans would have fought tooth and nail against it, just as they fought Clinton's legislative initiatives during the 90's while going along with the same agenda under George Bush.

Would Clinton have taken heat for such obvious amnesty plans as the ones Bush has been laying out for years?

Was the GOP Congress responsible for the balanced budgets of the 1990's but somehow the same body is NOT responsible in any way for the current deficits?
For that matter, is George Bush responsible for the deficits?
Is anybody responsible for the financial recklessness of the past 4 years?

Was Clinton able to pass any addition to Medicare as large as the "Prescription Drug benefit"?

Was Clinton able to double the Department of Education budget and tremendously centralize the curriculum of the public schools similar to "No Child Left Behind"?

Therefore, if the grand plan has been to get Bill Clinton into the UN Secretary General chair, Al Gore had to lose the election to George W Bush. What a coincidence that the key State was the one governed by his brother.

I believe that President Clinton was picked out many years ago to be the next great American globalist, and that when he is nominated and confirmed by the US and the UN in the next year or two, America's sovereignty will be in even more grave danger than it already is.