Nobody is that dumb...

Is it possible that George Bush is deliberately tanking his second term so that the Clinton/Bush stranglehold on the White House continues in 2008 when Hillary wins the election?

Evidence is piling up, and I just can't shake the notion.

After all, we could be doing a much better job in Iraq if we were willing to crush the enemy instead of providing him with prayer beads and access to reporters from Newsweek or Time.

He utterly refuses to patrol the Mexican border, despite the Minuteman project and the overwhelming data suggesting that an overwhelming majority of Americans don't want our homeland overrun by illegals who come here to bankrupt our social services.

He continues to overspend on socialist programs and huge centralizations of power in nearly every area of American society.

He has chosen to make Social Security his top domestic issue, which is a loser, instead of the Fair Tax plan, which would be a winner. Both are needed, but passage of the Fair Tax plan, combined with the repeal of the 16th amendment, could in and of itself stave off the collapse of social security for decades. On the other hand, social security reform will not make our tax code any simpler or more equitable.

Can the master plan be that George Bush is deliberately trying to make the GOP look so bad that the "swing voters" who decide all elections vote for Democrats on the notion that nothing could be worse than a GOP White House with a GOP Congress?

The bottom line is this: we have had enough of the Bush and Clinton families. Unfortunately, most Americans are spineless partisan hackers who have neither the ability, nor the inclination, to think critically about what our government is doing, and not doing, in our names.